Sunday, February 26, 2006

I'm Going To Marry Kristin Davis


Okay, I'll admit it, I used to watch Sex and the City. And I'll admit to having a crush on Kristin Davis. I mean, she's a very beautiful woman. And the scene where she's trying to demonstrate to Trey that he doesn't need porn is pretty damn hot. Of course, any woman would look gorgeous when compared to Sarah Jessica Parker, but still, Kristin Davis is really hot.
And yet, Hollywood informs me that I have a chance with her. In the upcoming film The Shaggy Dog, Kristin Davis plays Tim Allen's wife. In her last film, she played David Arquette's wife.
I mean, COME ON!
There is no reasonable way that a woman who looks like that could end up with a guy like Tim Allen or David Arquette. (And don't give me any of that Courtney Cox stuff. That woman is one sandwich shy of imploding.) If guys like them could get a woman like her, then clearly I have a shot too.
Now, clearly I don't. Clearly a woman who looks like that would end up with some handsome hunk (I'd like it noted that Kyle MacLachlan is a handsome man). But for some reason, Hollywood wants unattractive losers to believe that they can get a woman like Kristin Davis. It doesn't make any sense. Well, it makes sense in that it boosts the ego of pathetic schlubs like myself. And then it makes these guys feel better about themselves, encouraging them to watch the films and television shows. (Of course, its entirely possible that this practice also contributes to celebrity stalkers, but I have no proof of that.) But it has no place in reality.
Guys, if you want to think you can get a hot woman, watch porn. At least you can feel confident that, for $1000, you can enjoy an hour of PSE in Las Vegas with your favorite actress.

TNA Musings...And Other Thoughts

Once again, I find myself watching TNA Impact! on a Saturday night. And, once again, I find myself having some critical thoughts about the product.
  • With each passing week, my unrequited love for Gail Kim grows.
  • Eric Young is the most entertaining thing on the show.
  • That being said, I really think that making JJJ and Sting such a focus of the show is a big mistake. People don't like JJJ, and many people will change the channel to get away from him. Yet there he is, surrounded by the two beautiful ladies, the up and coming young talent, and the head booker. All for an angle involving a man who has wrestled all of one match thus far this year, and fewer than that the year before.
  • Konnan's LAX needs someone besides Machete. But to be honest, I can't think of another Hispanic wrestler who would fit. It would be interesting to see Amazing Red as a heel, but I don't think it would work. An underdog heel doesn't really work.
  • This punishment of Austin Aries and Roderick Strong is a big mistake. While I can understand TNA's point, yet also sympathize with Aries and Strong, I think there should be some happy medium. At this point, TNA is cutting off their nose to spite their face, denying two of the most promising young talents in their organization an opportunity to impress their fans. They are depriving Aries and Strong of a paycheck, but they are also cutting off a good angle, and taking away two of the wrestlers who help to provide a counterpoint to the WWE product. Nobody wins here.
  • I hate Larry Zybysko. Seeing him on television makes me want to kill puppies, because that would be more enjoyable than watching him.
  • Bullet Bob Armstrong could kick my ass.
  • Kip James needs to lose a hair vs hair match.
  • I can't believe Christian did a 'Bangkok' on television. That, my friends, is money. Chocolate bar money.
  • But Gail Kim is still hotter than both of them.
  • I still think the Ultimate X match between Samoa Joe, Christopher Daniels and AJ Styles is a big mistake right now. And having Larry Zybysko out there, talking about how perilous the match is just cheapens the match. Zybysko and X-Division go together like Matt Hardy and good career decisions.
  • Jackie Gayda is pretty damn hot. Charlie Haas is a lucky, lucky man.
  • But she's no Gail Kim.

Friday, February 24, 2006

Mania Musings



This year, I'm going to do something that I promised myself would never happen again. I'm going to miss Wrestlemania. The last time I missed Wrestlemania was Wrestlemania 19, when I foolishly chose to attend a school function for the Student Council that I had foolishly decided to become involved in. (Let that be a lesson kids, NEVER get involved in volunteer things that don't guarantee a return on your investment. Helping other people for the sake of helping other people is NEVER worth it.)

So I missed 'Mania, and then, because he is an incompetent boob, my buddy Andrew couldn't figure out how to work his VCR to copy the recording. So after he gave me two, count 'em, TWO, different tapes of TSN Curling, I knew I would have to wait to see the wrestling event of the year. So finally, in July, I was finally able to find Wrestlemania on DVD. And with that, I swore I would never miss another Wrestlemania again. And now, just a few years later, I am going to miss another 'Mania. Its like the High Holy Days have lost all meaning. (I should note at this point that my missing 'Mania is due to a class trip to check out Olympic facilities in Lake Placid and Montreal.)

And yet, despite my promise to myself, I find myself not caring. So far, according to the official WWE Wrestlemania site, the only announced match is Triple H vs John Cena for, um, whichever belt Cena has. Yawn. People are tired of seeing Triple H in championship matches, and they're crapping all over Cena's second title reign even more than his first. They're so afraid of the crowd reactions that they're keeping him off television in cities that have a history of not sticking to 'The Plan'. That's not supposed to happen with the World Champion. And what's even worse than the fact that the fans hate the champ is that this matchup will likely lead to Trips winning the belt. Not only will that suck for the simple fact that it means yet another mind numbing HHH title reign, but will also suck because the idea of a heel winning the belt at the biggest show of the year goes against what 'Mania is supposed to be...a celebration, an ending to the season, where the champion is a face, and the fans rejoice with their hero. Instead we'll have a heel (ostensibly a heel, since he'll probably get a majority of the fan support against Cena) spitting water on the fans, and in the faces of the people who follow wrestling.

Imagine how different things would be if 'The Plan' had been abandoned, and Edge had kept the title at the Royal Rumble. Then, instead of HHH winning the "tournament", have RVD win after kicking out of a pedigree. Now the main event is the fresh heel that fans are enjoying hating, and the recently returned face, who fans have tried desperately to get behind, despite the best efforts of the writing staff and the bookers. Now we have a main event that is fresh, is giving the fans what they want, and could end the biggest show of the year with a new champion, basking in the adoration of his fans.

None of the other matches that people are expecting are showing any hint of being planned with the fans in mind either. The one that comes closest is the addition of Rey Mysterio to the Angle v Orton match. Unfortunately, I have a feeling thats as far as the writers were willing to alter 'The Plan' and we'll be seeing an Orton title run beginning.

Edge v Foley does absolutely nothing for me. I'm sure Edge and Mick think it'll be great fun to have a 'Mania match, but I don't care about this match. And more importantly, I don't think it'll be very good. Foley seems to be a touch on the pudgy side. What would be better would be if Foley were to use this as a way to debut a new wrestler who will fight for him. But the "dedicated veterans" aren't going to let some punk rookie who hasn't paid his dues get a 'Mania payout when he's stuck at the Fan Festival signing autographs and shaking hands.

Money In The Bank, if it happens, should be a good match, given that it will probably consist of the actually talented wrestlers who are too good to outright release but not worth getting behind on the creative side. I see Carlito, RVD, Matt Hardy, Chavo Guerrero, Paul Burchill and Finlay in this, giving us a cross-promotional matchup.

But nothing really piques my interest. Instead, it seems like Wrestlemania this year is just another PPV, where we can rest assured that the King of Kings (and don't worry, I'll be attacking that moniker in a few days) once again assumes his rightful place atop the wrestling world, regardless of the fans and what they want. There will be no repeat of the classic ending to Wrestlemania XX, where Chris Benot and Eddie Guerrero, two longtime friends, stood together in the middle of the ring, holding aloft the belts that had been entrusted to them. There will be no Mania moment this year.

Thats what Wrestlemania is supposed to be about. Instead, this year, it appears to be about trying to make do, and doing what is necessary to force the fans to accept things that the writers, bookers and other power people want to see. So I won't feel too bad about not spending $49.95 for Wrestlemania. Instead, I'll enjoy my vacation, and, if I think it matters, I'll rent a copy of the show when it comes out on DVD.

Monday, February 20, 2006

Rubbin's Racin'

So, I'm writing a paper on NASCAR sponsorship, with a focus on controversial sponsors like alcohol and tobacco. So, with that in mind, I decided that I must immerse myself in the subject.

First stop, NASCAR.com. That website is fascinating. Probably one of the best corporate sports websites out there. It is accessible to both Nascar experts and neophytes. You can read about the history of the sport (or at least, the official history as endorsed by Nascar.) You can learn the basics, and then learn a bit more to familiarize yourself with the fastest-growing sport in North America. Plus, its the only sports website I've found with a business section, dedicated to outlining the financial aspects of NASCAR. To me, that is evidence that NASCAR is a much more corporate sport than the other major sports. If only I could get my ignorant professor to remove his sports blinders. But I digress. All the academics at my school are too ignorant to acknowledge the importance of studying sports isn't the point of this posting.

I then headed to my local Blockbuster, where I rented last years EA Sports offering, NASCAR 2005: Challenge For The Cup. With that, I began exploring the sport from a virtual perspective. I learned a few things, the most notable being that I can't drive worth a bit in a video game. So I had my roommate drive, while I made the business decisions. Thats all I really wanted anyway, to learn about the business side of the sport. Unfortunately, I discovered that owner mode is incredibly unsatisfying in the game. But, if nothing else, I was better informed about the drivers currently on the Nextel Cup circuit.

Armed with my new knowledge, I then proceeded to do what any person determined to master a new sport does. I signed up for Fantasy Nascar. I figured that this would give me a reason to become emotionally invested in the sport, by giving me certain racers to root for. Much like the other major sports, Nascar's fantasy sports section offers a number of different options, some of which involve paying money, but offer the opportunity to win more money. Being a poor student, I chose to go with the non-paying options.

Their Ultimate Fantasy League takes an interesting approach. They give you $100, and you have 24 hours to bid on 4 racers to compose your team. You and five other team owners all try to put together the best team you can, while not paying so much for one particular driver that you can't get three other good drivers to round out your team.

From there, I headed to the Weldon library to pick up some books for my paper. Right now, I'm working my way through Fixin' to Git by Jim Wright. Its a good book that takes an academic approach to the sport, while at the same time being written by an unabashed fan of NASCAR. Not only is it an enjoyable, informative read, but it also gives me hope that it is possible to write about sports, and to enjoy sports in an academic environment.

With my team in place, a fundamental knowledge of the basics, and a free afternoon, I sat down yesterday to watch the Daytona 500, the first race of the Nextel Cup season.

You know what?

It wasn't bad. It wasn't NFL action, but with my understanding of the intricacies of racing, I followed things rather well and got into it. The announcers were really good, giving viewers who may not know every detail about racing a good understanding of what they were seeing, while not being so basic that fans try to jab their eardrums out with a Q-tip. Or at least, I found their commentary to be good. They were certainly more enjoyable than Coach, or even Bob Cole and Harry Neale. Or just about any NFL commentator pairing.

I saw the leads change, I saw crashes and cautions, I saw drafting and pits. And I had fun. For me, the coolest part was the Doppler effect as the cars whipped past the cameras. Those boys are going damn fast.

It was an interesting experience, and one that I may have to repeat again sometime.

And oh yeah, my Ultimate Fantasy League team? Jimmie Johnson, Ryan Newman and Joe Nemechek, with Bobby Labonte on the bench. Thats right, the top two point getters for the day. Well, Newman finished third, but got a 5 point bonus to tie Casey Mears with 170. Needless to say, I won, even though my opponent had Tony Stewart. Either I'm more knowledgeable than I deserve to be, or I really lucked out.
I think Imma git me one a these.

Sunday, February 19, 2006

From One Night Stand To Prostitution


Last night, Paul Heyman and Taz (there is no second Z!) announced that, this June, New York would play host to another ECW-branded WWE PPV. Last year's ECW PPV, One Night Stand, is considered one of 2005's finest PPVs, capturing much of the spirit of ECW, although the event was marred heavily by the presence of people like JBL, Eric Bischoff, Kurt Angle and Coach. People who had no business associating themselves with ECW's legacy, but were all shoved in there in order to give WWE an excuse if the PPV did well, and to give their WWE superstars a PPV payday.
But by all accounts, the PPV was a success (I know I enjoyed it) and, when combined with Hardcore Homecoming and the two ECW documentaries, The Rise and Fall of ECW and Forever Hardcore, fans of ECW, both new and old, were given something that doesn't come along very often...closure.
But now it appears that WWE is going to try to capture lightning in a bottle one more time. In the words of the immortal Han Solo, "I've got a bad feeling about this."
I mean, lets take a look at the lineup from the last One Night Stand.

Lance Storm (with Dawn Marie) vs. Chris Jericho
  • Storm has retired to Calgary [dramatic pause] Alberta Canada, and while he will be appearing on a ROH show, seems to be happy in retirement, or at least, happy to not be stuck working WWE style any longer. They may be able to get him on the show, but it may require giving him a match HE wants (Storm v Benoit anyone?).
  • Dawn Marie, a very pregnant Dawn Marie, was released by WWE in one of the most controversial moves of 2005. I believe she currently has legal action pending with WWE, and I doubt she would want anything to do with this show.
  • Jericho has also broken free from the bonds of WWE, and is apparently pursuing a non-WWE career. Like Storm, he may be persuaded to return, but it would take offering him something HE wants. (Jericho v Storm v Benoit 3way dance anyone?)
  • A three way dance: The Insane Luchador Super Crazy vs. Tajiri (with Sinister Minister & Mikey Whipwreck) vs. Little Guido (with Big Guido, JT Smith, Tony Mamaluke & Tracy Smothers)
  • Super Crazy is currently under WWE contract, and is enjoying the wonderful world of Velocity. I'm sure he'd kill for some PPV money.
  • Tajiri requested, and received, his WWE release. From what I understand, the parting wasn't bitter, and he could be persuaded to come back.
  • Sinister Minister James Mitchell is a major player in TNA, and there is no way they'd let the best mouthpiece in the business appear on a WWE PPV out of the goodness of their hearts.
  • Mikey Whipwreck is...somewhere. He's probably game for another PPV.
  • Little Guido is still Nunzio, and is still stuck in WWE Velocity purgatory, putting on good matches only viewable on the Internet.
  • Big Guido is with him.The rest of the FBI is out there somewhere.
  • Extreme luchador action: Rey Mysterio vs. Psychosis
  • Rey Mysterio is about to lose his Wrestlemania title shot this evening.
  • Psychosis is stuck with Super Crazy and Little Guido on Velocity, putting on great matches that nobody watches.
  • The problem with this match is that it was heavily booed by the ECW fans at ONS. Maybe they could use the opportunity to redeem themselves, but just doing this match again may not placate the fans.
    Rhyno vs. Sabu
  • Rhyno is now a major player in TNA. His appearance is incredibly unlikely.
  • Sabu is also in TNA, although he hasn't been used much since his incredible barbed wire match with Abyss. I'd also put him in the highly unlikely category.
    Eddie Guerrero vs Chris Benoit
  • Eddie is gone. God, I miss him.
  • Benoit is still in WWE, and he would probably love an evening to remind us that he's one of the best damn wrestlers in the world today.
  • Mike Awesome vs. Masato Tanaka
  • Mike Awesome is somewhere.
  • Masato Tanaka is in Japan.
  • But are they going to try to top last year's match of the night? This is the exact opposite of Rey/Psychosis. Their match at ONS was awesome, and redeemed Awesome in the eyes of many. If he comes back, it could ruin all that.
    Tommy Dreamer & The Sandman vs Bubba & D-Von Dudley
  • Tommy Dreamer is working backstage for WWE (and I think in OVW). I'm sure he'd be up for a match.
  • The Sandman, from what I understand, doesn't need the money, and would need to be persuaded.
  • Bubba & D-Von were treated quite shabbily in being released by WWE, and are now making their mark on TNA. I'd say their appearance is the least likely of all.
  • To this list, you can probably add RVD, who is about to be buried on Monday night at the hands of HHH. And Taz, who never really got a goodbye match. Kid Kash is also in WWE Cruiserweight purgatory. I believe Doring and Roadkill are also under WWE contract in OVW, and I'm sure Axl Rotten and Balls Mahoney would come back as well. Nova and Stevie Richards are also under WWE contract, although you wouldn't know it if you watched their shows.
    The problem is that RVD, whose ONS promo was incredible, needs an opportunity to show why he is the Whole Fucking Show. And he needs Jerry Lynn for that. And Jerry Lynn is in TNA.
    Taz needs Sabu to put a cap on one of the greatest rivalries of all time. And I don't see that happening.
    Doring and Roadkill never really had any ECW rivalries, and are more associated with the last days of the promotion, as opposed to its heyday. The same holds true for Kid Kash.
    So the amount of ECW talent under WWE contract has decreased, and most of the names that people would want to see aren't there. That, added to the fact that many of the big ECW names, like Raven, Shane Douglas, and Terry Funk are still either unavailable to WWE or completely uninterested in doing WWE business, means that this next WWECW PPV will be weaker than last year.
    Plus, there's still the Blue Meanie/JBL unpleasantness hanging over the head of ONS, which may sour some people on doing business with WWE, given the way in which the situation was handled by WWE.
    Finally, WWE has also become a big bully, trying to take away established identities, such as the theft of the name Dudley from the now named Team 3-D, and the theft of the name Justin Credible, is showing WWE's meaner side that isn't exactly earning them any love with independent wrestlers trying to make a living without the WWE machine on their side.
    This next ECW PPV isn't going to recapture the magic of last year. But it is indicative of the WWE mindset right now. Something worked in the past, so lets keep trying it until it fails. And even then, if it fails, its because the talent didn't do their job properly, or because the fans didn't 'get it', not because the promoter or the creative team aren't doing their job.
    If they really want to put on a Paul Heyman PPV, give Ohio Valley Wrestling a PPV. Call it "Future Legends" or something like that, and let the fans see the future of the industry before Stephanie and her writers have the chance to destroy any credibility they may have had. Word is, Paul Heyman's OVW is the highlight of the WWE when it comes to storylines, psychology and fan reaction. So why not give these kids, who are working for very little money, a chance at the big time, without the WWE restrictions, politics and other nonsense.
    The problem with this idea is that it would require admitting that Paul Heyman knows what he's doing better than Nipple H and Vince. And thats running completely contrary to the whole reason for ONS, which was to make money for Vince, but also to prove that ECW needs WWE to truly succeed.

    Decisions, Decisions

    Once again, there are a whole bunch of DVDs I need to buy, or will need to buy in upcoming weeks. In no particular order:

  • ECW Bloodsport - I discuss this later. So read the rest, then think back to this near the end of this post.
  • 20 Years Too Soon - The Superstar Billy Graham Story - I've seen some teaser stuff, and read Burgan's review on the Observer site. Damn, this looks good.
  • Best of Christopher Daniels: Heaven Sent, Hell Bound - Seriously, do I need to explain why I need this?
  • The Richard Pryor Show - My desert island CDs include Pryor and Lenny Bruce. Now we need a box set of Pryor's and Wilder's movies.
  • Action: The Complete Series - This show was brilliant. Buddy Hackett was hilarious, and it ripped on Hollywood better than Last Action Hero ever dreamed, and was more accessible than The Player.
  • Grosse Pointe: The Complete Series - I think I'm the only person who watched this show. But it had Irene Molloy. Plus, it was actually pretty funny.

    Plus, WWE.com has listed these upcoming DVDs:
  • Austin vs. McMahon: The Definitive Collection - I'm skeptical. Sounds like Vince really wants to recapture the glory days. Maybe Vince will watch the DVD and remember that Austin became a star because he connected with the fans, and plans were changed to take advantage of this. But it could be nice to enjoy what we, the fans, had back then, in the days before the McMahon-Helmsley era began.
  • Brian Pillman: Loose Cannon - This should be awesome. But they need to focus on what Pillman could do IN the ring, and not just his wacky antics. But I've gotta say, I really hope the gun thing is in there.
  • Hulk Hogan: The Ultimate Anthology - This is supposed to be a 4-discer. That'll show all those people who bought the 2-disc set a few years ago. The question is who will the Hulkster wrestle when he makes his return to promote this?
  • Born to Controversy: The Roddy Piper Story - So long as Piper is involved, it should be good. It'll be like the Jake Roberts DVD, where the matches are secondary. (But still better than half the stuff we're offered today.)
  • The Spectacular Legacy of the AWA - Please, oh please, oh please, let it involve the AWA Team Challenge Series and the "Great American Turkey Hunt."
  • John Cena: The Time is Now - The time actually IS now, because once HHH is done with him, Cena won't have any credibility left.
  • The World's Greatest Wrestling Managers - Is it irony when a company which has done their best to kill the tradition of the wrestling manager now capitalizes on the nostalgia of the fans to promote a DVD showcasing how vital wrestling managers once were, and what we're missing by not having them around today?
  • The American Dream: The Dusty Rhodes Story - Are we gonna find out what was in the envelope?
  • WWE Divas Do New York - Alas, my name isn't New York.
  • ECW Blood Sport: The Most Violent Matches -- Volume II - I like the idea behind this. But it also shows that Vince and Co. still don't quite get what ECW was, and what it still means to people. ECW wasn't JUST about violence. Oh, violence was part of it. But it wasn't the only part of it. But I guess its just easier to say that it was all about the violence. It saves them from thinking about what they didn't do then, and what they're not doing now.

    Oh well, I guess I need to choose between tuition and these DVDs. I think I'll enjoy the DVDs more.
  • Saturday, February 18, 2006

    Randomblings

    After a number of entirely too thinky posts about pro wrestling, I think I'm just going to to offer some random ramblings. Or, randomblings. Yes, the name is stupid, but its late, and I'm not feeling particularly creative. Most of these will be inspired by TNA Impact, which I am watching as I type.

  • Shannon Moore.

    I've never been a huge Shannon Moore fan. This isn't a slight on his talent or anything, its just that he's always been a secondary character. From 3-Count, to Matt's M-F'er, Moore has never been a bigtime player. Particularly because there are guys who do the follower thing so much better. (Eric Young, I'm looking at you.) And I think its cool that he's trying to prove his place as a top guy.

    But seriously, the "Prince of Punk?" Thats your gimmick? And this is how you look?
  • Dude, you look like a moron. Good Charlotte is more punk than you. Hell, Hillary Duff is more punk than you. I admire the thought of establishing an identity for yourself that doesn't require Shane Helms or Matt Hardy, but this isn't it.
  • Gail Kim is really hot.


  • I am loving this Samoa Joe/AJ Styles/Christopher Daniels stuff. That being said, I think having an Ultimate X Match at the next PPV is a genuinely bad idea. They are making it very clear that these three are the best of the X-Division, and everyone else is just a pretender. Instead, this feud should be put on a slow simmer for a while. At the next PPV, have AJ face the aforementioned Shannon Moore in a blowoff to their little mini-feud. Have Daniels face someone like Sabin, Bentley or Petey Williams. And have Joe defend against Sonjay Dutt. The most important thing that Joe (and a number of other X-Division wrestlers) has shown, is that just because one guy wins, it doesn't mean that the defeated wrestler has to be devalued.

    This would allow some other X-Division wrestlers to be elevated, and would allow the Joe/AJ/Daniels feud to evolve at a better rate and not get burned out. Plus, it could allow them to keep the feud going for the big primetime debut on Spike.

  • I want Larry Zybysko off my television set. NOW. How does being married to Verne Gagne's daughter get you a job now?

  • Seriously, look at her. She's freaking gorgeous.

  • The Movie Network broadcasts porn in HD. Really, who needs HD porn?

  • Straight Shooting

    So, in a followup to this post, Chris Kanyon has posted a commentary about his recent 'coming out' and some of the wrestling 'media' have responded. And it just keeps getting weirder.
    Kanyon's commentary has some interesting comments on sexuality and gender, and how such problematic concepts can be further problematized when put into a spectacular and constructed environment like professional wrestling. Perhaps the most important quote from Kanyon's commentary is when he mentions that

    "Ultimately, you will know the truth, but the question now is less about me and
    more about you, how you deal with and perceive the question and possible
    answers. The question is less about my sexuality and more about our society and
    how homosexuality fits into sports, entertainment and our culture in general."

    What is interesting is that Kanyon has come out as gay, but Chris Klucsarits, the man who portrays the character Chris Kanyon, has not. Klucsarits says that he will address his own personal sexuality at some point in the future, but for the time being, he is content to leave the question out there.

    Now, I agree with some of this, but other parts of it leave me a little disturbed. I like the idea of Klucsarits/Kanyon problematizing notions of gender and sexuality in the realm of professional wrestling. Just as one is never sure where reality ends and performance begins in professional wrestling, the same holds true for gender. How much of our gender and sexuality is a performance, and how much is a natural extension of our true selves? Is there anything natural to gender and sexuality, or is it all learned behaviour?

    How many women wear certain clothing only because they feel it is expected of them? How many men? More importantly, how many men deny a homosexual attraction because they feel it is 'wrong'? How many women? How much of what we do as men and women is because it is expected of us, and how much is simply something that we feel comfortable doing? These are the sort of questions that need to be asked when addressing issues of sexuality and gender. Hell, they're just barely scraping the surface, and I'm sure that post-feminist gender theorists would have my head for trying to simplify such a complex issue.

    So thats why I think Kanyon's outing is a good thing. However, where I have a problem is in Kanyon's attributing his firing from WWE to revelations of his sexuality. If, as Klucsarits says, Kanyon and Klucsartis need to considered separately, one as a character, and one as a performer, then it is impossible for Kanyon to have been fired. Klucsartis was released from WWE, not Kanyon. Kanyon could not be released, because Kanyon exists only as a perormance. Kanyon's sexuality had nothing to do with it, because Kanyon's sexuality is merely part of the performance. By blaming the release on WWE's attitudes towards homosexuality seems to be either a cheap attempt to garner sympathy from people who resent WWE for other things, or is something that was said before it was decided to bring the performative nature of gender to the forefront of this debate. Either way, such an accusation should not have been made if Klucsartis was not prepared to be completely honest about his own sexuality.

    Of course, this is merely response to the way this 'story' has evolved, and others have had their own take. Of the three sites I mentioned in my first post, PWTorch and PWInsider have both addressed it. The Wrestling Observer still has not, but that doesn't surprise me. Meltzer is, for the most part, a reporter of facts, not a commentator. While Meltzer's opinion is respected, it is not the reason people read the site or the newsletter. I've been assured that Da Meltz knows all about this, and he has chosen not to address the issue. Besides, Meltzer has Burgan, Martin, Williams and others to provide commentary for him.

    On PWTorch, columnist James Caldwell posted an editorial on the subject, essentially dismissing Kanyon's commentary as trivializing the issue. But Kanyon has responded to Caldwell on his site, so I don't feel any need to do so. The issue received less coverage on PWInsider, where Dave Scherer posted Kanyon's commentary with the following caveat,

    "Note from Scherer: I wasn't sure if we should run this or not, since I am not
    sure what the point of it is, but in the interested of bringing the readers the
    latest news, here it is."

    He then followed that up with this post later in the day.

    "For those who have emailed me about the post that Chris Kanyon sent out, I
    don't get it either. As I said in the post itself, I debated whether we
    should even run it since I wasn't sure if it was work, shoot, worked shoot, shot
    work or what. I am not a big fan of running angles on the net, and I never
    was. I think it alienates more people that it intrigues."

    To me, it seems that Scherer wants some form of authenticity. Of course, what Kanyon's commentary and post are about are the lack of authenticity, both in the world of professional wrestling, and in the realm of sexuality. He seems to want to ignore the greater social issues of Kanyon's commentary, and instead chooses to focus on the ambiguity of the situation. But then again, as I said in my first post, the first rule about Gay Pro Wrestlers is...We Don't Talk About Gay Pro Wrestlers. To me, Scherer's comments indicate a desire to increase traffic to his sity by posting something about the situation, but a refusal to address the situation in any meaningful way, thereby avoiding any actual discussion of the larger social issues.

    Is Kanyon's recent admission of homosexuality a work or a shoot? That doesn't matter. Gender, like professional wretling, is a performance. Nothing is false, because nothing is real. What is more important about this whole situation is that it should be causing people to think about how we think about sexuality. Its not often that professional wrestling can be seen as a site of social commentary, but in this instance, I think that opportunity has arisen, and we should take advantage of it.

    But of course, there is one other site that has yet to address the issue. GayProWrestling.com. I mean, come on, they've been handed this thing on a silver platter, and nothing!

    Saturday, February 11, 2006

    The More Things Change, The More They Suck

    Loonatics Unleashed.

    Those two words should be enough to strike fear into the hearts of any decent cartoon lover. I watched my first episode this morning, and was appalled at what I saw. Not really by the content of the cartoon, but because of what it stands for.

    For those not in the know, Loonatics is a re-invention of the classic Looney Tunes cartoons featuring Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, Wile E. Coyote, Road Runner and the Tazmanian Devil. Only they've been turned into Ace Bunny, Danger Duck, Tech E. Coyote, Rev Runner and Slam Tasmanian. Also added is Lexi Bunny. Missing are Elmer Fudd, Porky Pig, Yosemite Sam, Foghorn Leghorn, Tweety Bird, Sylvester the Cat and all the rest of the Looney Tunes/Merrie Melodies/Warner Bros. cartoon classics.

    The Loonatics are a team of superheroes in the year 2772, when the city-planet Acmetropolis has been knocked off its axis by a meteor. The Loonatics work together to fight supervillains, while attempting to entertain with clever one-liners. Its genuinely awful, complete with poor design, bad dialogues and mind-numbing plotlines.

    Now, if this were a standalone cartoon, I would just think it was another moronic cartoon designed by the empty-headed, unimaginative piece of garbage being fed to the children of today. Heck, I might even be pleasantly surprised that this one isn't predicated on some horrible commercialization of a poor Western interpretation of Eastern mysticism (I'm looking your way Avatar!) But this cartoon is supposed to be associated with the classic cartoons of days gone by. Its supposed to be carrying on the tradition of Friz Freleng, Chuck Jones and Tex Avery. Instead, its pissing on their memories.

    Granted, the classic Looney Tunes cartoons haven't been treated particularly well over the ages. Up here in Canada, our version of The Cartoon Network, Teletoon, shows Looney Tunes cartoons every morning, and in the afternoons on weekends. What I often see are the 'movie' versions of these cartoons. These ones are a bunch of cartoon shorts edited till they're shells of their former selves, and then spliced together with a really bad unifying plot, which usually has absolutely nothing to do with the cartoons, and are also often poorly drawn insults to the name of animation.

    The most notable of these is Private Eye Elmer Fudd's search for the 'Mystewious Stwangew'. It's just horrible, and these compilation shows are a blight on the memory of the classics.

    Recently, it seemed that the Time-Warner was trying to apologize for this, with their release of the Looney Tunes Golden Collection DVD sets. (Okay, atone and make money from people who want to own these important slices of North American pop culture.) But these Loonatics show that the memory of these classic cartoons means nothing to these people. Its sad really.

    And just in case you might think that I'm one of those conservatives who oppose any attempts to bring classics into the next generation, I should point out that I commend The Cartoon Network and The WB for their respective Justice League Unlimited and The Batman cartoons. Smart, sharp and entertaining reinventions of classic comic characters that do a fine job of carrying on a tradition begun so many years ago.

    Thursday, February 09, 2006

    An Open Letter to Vince McMahon

    Dear Vince,

    You don't know me. We've never met. Let me tell you a little about myself.

    I'm a wrestling fan. Have been for years. I watched Wrestlemania III on closed-circuit when I was in Grade 8. I bought tickets to shows at the local arena, even though they were always the B or C circuit. I watched Saturday Night's Main Event whenever I could, and tried to follow the storylines as best I could through your syndicated programming.

    As I've grown up, I've continued to watch. Unlike many of my grade school and secondary school friends who left professional wrestling behind, I continued to be a fan. I watched Monday Night Raw when you had a very poor television contract here in Canada. I went to live PPV and Monday Night Raw broadcasts whenever I could.

    I saw Jake Roberts' cobra take a bite out of Randy Savage's arm. I saw Earthquake 'crush' Damien. I saw Steve Austin break into Brian Pillman's house while Pillman held a gun. I saw Val Venis almost get his penis cut off. I saw Mae Young give birth to a hand. I saw Chaz the girlfriend beater. I saw Bossman drag the coffin of Big Show's dad around the cemetery. I saw the Undertaker crucify Steve Austin. Sorry, I meant I saw the Undertaker suspend Steve Austin from a symbol. I saw JBL goosestep on the ring apron. I saw Jim Ross announce Owen Hart's death. I saw Owen's friends mourn him.

    I've seen it all Vince, and I've stayed a fan. I've loved the shows, I've hated some of the stuff, but I kept watching. So Vince, I have to ask you.

    Why do you want me to stop watching?

    I'm not going to say that you've gone too far, because that is a purely subjective thing. There is no definite line to be crossed. Instead, there is merely one's own moral compass to guide them.
    But if you're going to stay on the path you seem to have chosen for your programming, I'm going to stop watching. I can't support this product any longer. This constant use and abuse of the memory of Eddie Guerero indicates an incredible lack of respect for the man, his family, his friends, and his fans. Eddie Guerrero is no longer a WWE employee to be manipulated, directed and written about to suit your storylines. Eddie Guerrero is a memory, a tragic reminder of just how fleeting life truly is.

    By now, I'm sure you've read Mick Foley's blog on this whole situation. And I'm sure you've heard some of the criticisms that other members of the IWC have written/said (although I'm sure you'll deny that.) And I have a feeling that the more people criticize you, the more you will decide to continue on this path, if only to show that you can't be swayed.

    So I'm not going to tell you to stop. I'm not going to ask you to stop. I'm not going to use words like 'disgusting', 'vile', 'repugnant', or 'reprehensible.' I'm just going to ask you my question.
    Why do you want me to stop watching?

    Because the current storylines don't compell me to watch. They make me uncomfortable. They make me change the channel. And I feel no urge to switch back.

    So if you don't want me watching your professional wrestling product anymore, ignore my letter. The choice is yours. But the final choice is mine.

    Wednesday, February 08, 2006

    Who Betta?

    A friend of mine recently forwarded me a link to a story that she found rather interesting. Well, for her, it was kind of depressing, but it was pretty interesting for me. Here's the story. (Click on the Feb. 4th results). You can also go here, and look for the news listed as being Tuesday, January 7th, but should probably read Tuesday, FEBRUARY 7th. But the people at Slam! are good people, so I won't rip on them too much. Who really wants to admit its February anyway?

    Anyway, in case you didn't bother to click the links, or couldn't find the story, here's a quick cut and paste from the first link.

    "At this time Chris Kanyon requested a few minutes to speak to the crowd. In an emotional delivery, Chris Kanyon said that he believes that the reason he was fired from WWE was not because of cutbacks, not because they didn't have a storyline for him, or any other reason you might have heard. Following some very nasty words for WWE and Vince McMahon, Kanyon revealed to the crowd that he believes that he was fired because the higher ups in WWE found out that he is GAY. Kanyon then said he was tired of living in the closet and announced to the awestruck crowd that he was in fact a homosexual. He said he couldn't live another day living the lie. He then pronounced himself as the first openly gay professional wrestler in the industry. He then went on to say that he chose to be the real Chris Kanyon, and the fans had to chose whether they wanted to boo him or cheer him. Either way it was their choice and life is about choices. He was finally happy that he made his. Tonight would be the first time that Chris Kanyon wrestled with the weight off his shoulders."

    Now, my friend emailed me this link yesterday. And since then, I haven't seen anything on any of the major wrestling news sites about this story, apart from that misdated newsbite on the Slam! Wrestling site. But people should be talking about this. This is news. This is the kind of thing that people of the world should be standing up and taking notice of. But...nothing.

    In fact, neither Kanyon's official website, www.chriskanyon.net nor his MySpace page, have anything about this either. So its entirely possible that this is a big fat lie, concocted by this promotion to bring some publicity to their organization (and if thats the case, boy is that not working). But I doubt that. Blood, Sweat & Ears has a good reputation in Ontario for putting on quality rock n wrestling shows, and I doubt they would damage their reputation in the industry by making something like this up. Unless of course its a work that Kanyon is in on, to see how the net handles the whole thing.

    And as for the lack of coverage on Kanyon's official online presences, its pretty easy to chalk this up to not having enough time to get to it yet. I mean, I imagine the life of a pro wrestler or a pro wrestler's webmaster is pretty hectic, and we can't expect immediate updates. I expect we'll see something on this in the next few days. Provided its true.

    But the lack of coverage on major wrestling news sites (Wrestling Observer, PWTorch, PWInsider being my big three)is truly mind boggling. But my boggled mind does have a few theories:

    1) They don't know yet.

    This one is about as plausible as Chuck Liddell losing to Jorge Rivera. These guys know everything.

    2) They are skeptical as to the veracity of this news, and they are waiting for some official news from Kanyon himself before writing on it.

    Entirely possible, but at the same time, rumours spread like wildfire in the IWC (that's Internet Wrestling Community). See Hardy, Matt and Maff,Dan/Cide, Homi for more on this.

    3) They're waiting for an official announcement from Kanyon because they don't want to risk a libel lawsuit.

    I suspect this one has a good chance of being true. Should this prove to be a lie, or a work, I can see why they would not want to get caught up in this, particularly if Mr. Kanyon was feeling litigious.

    4) They don't want to talk about it because they don't feel it would be proper to discuss Kanyon's sexuality, as there should be no need to discuss such a subject.

    Man, do I wish this were the one. I wish we lived in a world where stuff like sexuality didn't matter, and people were free to love who they loved. (If, you know, you believe in love.) But we don't, and they aren't. It's getting slightly better, but we ain't there yet.

    5) They don't want to talk about it, because the First Rule of Gay Pro Wrestlers Is...We Don't Talk About Gay Pro Wrestlers. And the Second Rule of Gay Pro Wrestlers...

    Sadly, I think this may be it. And yet, if this is true, Kanyon has really forced everybody's hand. He's made it public, and announced it openly to, well, not really the world, but a crowd of a few hundred people in Sudbury [dramatic pause] Ontario Canada.

    Let's face it, Professional Wrestling is probably not the most accepting and openminded industry in the world. This is a business that, every few years or so, comes up with a heel (bad guy) character, or characters, who are coded as being gay, and are subjected to crowd chants consisting of the words 'faggot', 'homo', 'die', 'kill' and often, 'the'. In the glory days of WCW's Filthy Animals, Konnan used to make comments involving the 'tossing of salad' to denigrate his opponents. Dustin Rhodes' Goldust was one of the most hated heels in the business until he proclaimed that he liked women, at which point he became the faciest of faces, beloved by fans worldwide.

    (And of course, homosexuality is not the only way to be 'othered' in North American professional wrestling...you can also try being non-white, non-male, non-English speaking, or generally not resembling a strong, straight, English White Man. But I digress.)

    It should also be noted that, generally, it is okay to be a lesbian in professional wrestling. At least, its okay to be a lesbian if you're really hot, have a great rack, wear skimpy clothing and will be willing to have a 3-way with a guy. If you're not a hot lesbian who also likes the cock, then you're EVIL!

    I mean, any discussion of the politics of a professional wrestling locker room will invariably lead to a discovery that there are a large number of Republicans in the room, many of whom profess to be Born-Again Christians. And its entirely possible that they are only Republicans because they prefer George W. Bush's fiscal policies, and are actually socially progressive Republicans. Or that they are Christians who are more likely to know where the word LOVE can be found in the Bible than the words STONE TO DEATH. But somehow, I doubt it. I suspect that, in general, the attitudes in most professional wrestling locker rooms consists of a great deal of homophobia, misogyny and a barely suppressed racism. The last of these is likely most often disguised as "good natured ribbing" that the victims "just don't get".

    Many of the testimonials surrounding the late Eddie Guerrero mentioned his being a proud Christian, sharing his faith in the locker room. And I'm sure Eddie, having been through what he had, had nothing but the best of intentions in sharing his faith and his love for Christ. I (unlike others in the industry) have no intention of denigrating this man. However, I have seen first-hand, how a shared faith, meant to be held out as an olive branch, can easily turn into a club. How the Bible, which, at its best, is a story of love, redemption, acceptance and rebirth, is too often used as a tool of hatred, destruction, attack, rebuke and, sometimes, death. (See Phelps, Rev. Fred for more.) To me, its not too difficult to imagine these wrestlers, who gather in prayer, to use that opportunity to attack someone for something they perceive as being a sin.

    I mean, this is a business that sees men get blacklisted for buying first-class plane tickets, or not saying hello properly. A business where feces is used as a means of making sure a woman knows her place. A business that still believes that a stiff beating is the best way to make sure someone has learned their lesson about not showing the proper respect to a veteran. I'm afraid to imagine how a man whose sexuality went against "God's laws" would be accepted in the locker room. (Or maybe I don't have to imagine. If Kanyon's suspicions are correct, then evidently the best way to deal with a gay wrestler is to fire him, but make sure you say there was nothing in the creative plans for him, to ensure he doesn't have a case if he tries to make a federal case out of it.)

    Of course, I would be remiss if I didn't mention the prominent homosexuals in the professional wrestling industry. All two of them. The late, great Jim Barnett was gay. He was also, at one time, one of the most powerful men in professional wrestling. He is responsible for many of the changes to the industry. He was, from what I gather, a tenacious business man and a driving force in professional wrestling's evolution.

    Pat Patterson, one of Montreal's finest, is also gay. This man's classic Street Fight with Sgt. Slaughter was hardcore before there was a hardcore to be. Hell, the dude's over 60, and I still wouldn't want him angry at me.

    But I wonder how many people these two men were open with, at least until they achieved positions of power where the truth could no longer ruin them. Hell, whenever I saw Patterson on WWE/F television, he was billed as being from New Orleans to account for his Quebecois accent. He was a closeted Montrealer! Not that there's anything wrong with that.

    But for a professional wrestler, still trying to make a living as a professional wrestler, to openly admit to being gay, is anathema to the industry. The fans are encouraged/prompted/trained to hate 'gay' wrestlers. From the effeminate Gorgeous George (without whom there would be no Louisville Lip, Muhammad Ali) to Exotic Adrian Street, to Adorable Adrian Adonis, to Michelle Starr, to Goldust, to Leni & Lodi, Billy & Chuck, Rico, and the Christopher Street Connection, these characters have always been the bad guys. (And keep on the lookout for the rumoured new, improved, BISEXUAL, Orlando Jordan!) And they weren't bad because they broke rules, or kicked puppies, or slapped sweet old ladies or stole money from orphans. They were bad because they loved men. Or, at least pretended to like men.

    Professional wrestling, like many professional sports, is one still dominated by a rigid sense of masculinity that precludes difference. Particularly differences that challenge this rigid structure. Men of different ethnicities are more tolerated now, but that has taken time, and still isn't a model for cultural diversity. (See Nolan, Ted for more.) But men who love men? This is verboten. Particularly if those men ADMIT to such a deviance from the norm.

    So, if this is true, and Kanyon has admitted to being gay, I'm happy. Happy that he has decided his own happiness and self-worth is more important than the prejudices of a bunch of closed-minded intolerant fools. Happy that a man who's talent, ability, dignity and character have already been well established in the industry is now willing to add one more dimension to his public identity. But most importantly, I'm happy that this will, hopefully, cause the professional wrestling industry, and the world in general, to re-examine the conventions and standards held so dearly. (Okay, and I'm happy because Kanyon had some pretty cute female fans, who must now find a different man to lust after.)

    Chris Kanyon is called the "Innovator of Offense." He is one of those wrestlers who is constantly working to find new ways to entertain the crowd, while protecting his co-workers. Time and again, he has gone above the call of duty for his employers. The most notable example is his ridiculously risky fall from WCW's three-tier cage to the stage below. Hell, he even pretended to be Oliver Platt in the abysmal Ready to Rumble, and he helped train whatever celebrities WCW brought in, to make sure they didn't kill themselves or their opponents. (I'm not saying he made them into competent wrestlers, I'm just saying he made them less horrible. Which is something.)

    But now, he's innovating in a new way. He's a recognized, semi-prominent wrestler. He has a reputation, and his name has some Q rating for wrestling fans. And by coming out, he's (hopefully) going to change the way that people, both wrestlers and fans alike, think about issues of sexuality.

    As Jim Rome once said, "If you don't think you'd be comfortable showering with a gay man in the locker room, guess what...you already have."